ghostcondensate: (Default)
Harry Feynman ([personal profile] ghostcondensate) wrote in [community profile] tcnetwork2017-05-15 12:41 am

Cool Ranch Harry / Lyoshka Aethra

 

Lyoshka Aethra / Cool Ranch Harry / Jacob Marley-Feynman

Inventor, "Ghost"
Former Faculty Researcher, Experimental Atomic Physics Group - RLE, MIT
Owner of Pulp Kitchen
Brother of Harry Feynman from Another Universe

badgirlshenanigans: (concerned face)

Re: 14/05

[personal profile] badgirlshenanigans 2017-05-15 05:21 am (UTC)(link)
My girlfriend left the planet, by choice.

Then, I get you, telling me I should sleep with you, who already has a wife, and a life, and kids, and what sort of person does that?
badgirlshenanigans: (definitely no)

Re: 14/05

[personal profile] badgirlshenanigans 2017-05-15 05:38 am (UTC)(link)
She's not a bitch, she just didn't love me. I thought she did, but she didn't.

The one with your wife and kids? The one we're searching to get you back to?
badgirlshenanigans: (disagree)

Re: 14/05

[personal profile] badgirlshenanigans 2017-05-15 05:54 am (UTC)(link)
Or to an earlier time, shortly after you disappeared so it'll be like it barely happened for them?
badgirlshenanigans: (Default)

Re: 14/05

[personal profile] badgirlshenanigans 2017-05-15 02:55 pm (UTC)(link)
But time isn't absolute. It's wibbly-wobbly-timey-wimey.
badgirlshenanigans: (profiled)

Re: 14/05

[personal profile] badgirlshenanigans 2017-05-16 12:55 am (UTC)(link)
But that wouldn't happen, as you're not there.
badgirlshenanigans: (not again)

Re: 14/05

[personal profile] badgirlshenanigans 2017-05-16 01:17 am (UTC)(link)
That's my point, adding you in when you weren't there originally only creates an altered timeline, not s paradox. You know your theory well enough to know that.
badgirlshenanigans: (why this?)

Re: 14/05

[personal profile] badgirlshenanigans 2017-05-16 01:46 am (UTC)(link)
Cionsensual reality relies on the group believing what happens is true, or the practicality of it. Everyone who fluxes in here from another time or place, only to return are all proof consensual reality cannot exist in practicality.
badgirlshenanigans: (definitely no)

Re: 14/05

[personal profile] badgirlshenanigans 2017-05-16 02:04 am (UTC)(link)
And you're using consensual reality as an argument that sums up to: you don't know what I do? There's a level of larger purpose or universal cohesion or higher power, or however you want to phrase it, and your placing yourself to an extent, as that power.

If we send you to your own reality, you're not getting monstrosities. Talk to the Doctor. If anyone can explain time and realities, it's him.
badgirlshenanigans: (Default)

Re: 14/05

[personal profile] badgirlshenanigans 2017-05-16 02:16 am (UTC)(link)
And what is one major difference between that reality and this one?
badgirlshenanigans: (Hells no Fitz)

Re: 14/05

[personal profile] badgirlshenanigans 2017-05-16 02:38 am (UTC)(link)
I was going to say we clearly agreed on whatever it was that caused the destruction, and even then, that destruction, as far as we know, is limited only to this planet.

And why does everything come back around to us having sex? Pretty sure it wouldn't be that amazing.
badgirlshenanigans: (pleased with myself)

Re: 14/05

[personal profile] badgirlshenanigans 2017-05-16 02:54 am (UTC)(link)
Because two people have the power to cause havoc to an entire reality.

Hit a nerve, have I?
badgirlshenanigans: (ooooooo)

Re: 14/05

[personal profile] badgirlshenanigans 2017-05-16 02:58 am (UTC)(link)
Definitely hit a nerve.

Page 1 of 20